Comparative study of double and dual electroinduction spherical electric field strength sensors
https://doi.org/10.25206/1813-8225-2024-191-125-132
EDN: IXQSUI
Abstract
The work provides a comparative study of double and dual electric field strength sensors. The comparison examined the design, technological and metrological parameters of the sensors, as well as the complexity of their measuring circuits. Research has revealed similarities in the design and technological parameters of the sensors and differences in metrological characteristics and the complexity of the measuring circuits. In terms of metrological characteristics, dual sensors are significantly superior to double ones. It has been established that a dual sensor having sensitive elements with angular dimensions q1=46,38 °, and q2=90 °, has a smaller error due to field inhomogeneity. The error does not exceed d£½ ±2,76½ % in the spatial measurement range 0£a£1. With the same error, double sensors can only be used in a limited spatial measurement range of 0£a£0,89. It is shown that dual sensors are superior to dual sensors in terms of metrological parameters. This indicates the advisability of their use.
About the Author
S. V. Biryukov
Omsk State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Biryukov Sergey Vladimirovich - Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Professor of Physics Department, SPIN-code: 9384-0078. AuthorID (SCOPUS): 7006438919.
Omsk
References
1. Ptitsyna N. G., Villorezi D., Dorman L. I. [et al.] Estestvennyye i tekhnogennyye nizkochastotnyye magnitnyye polya kak faktory, potentsial’no opasnyye dlya zdorov’ya [Natural and man-made low-frequency magnetic fields as a potential health hazard] // Uspekhi fizicheskikh nauk. Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk. 1998. No. 168 (7). P. 767–791. DOI: 10.3367/UFNr.0168.199807d.0767. (In Russ.).
2. GOST 12.1.045-84 SSBT. Elektrostaticheskiye polya. Dopustimyye urovni na rabochikh mestakh i trebovaniya k provedeniyu kontrolya [Occupational safety standards system. Electrostatic fields. Tolerance levels and methods of control at working places]. Moscow, 2006. 4 p. (In Russ.).
3. Korobkova V. P., Morozov Yu. A., Stolyarov M. D. [et al.]. Vozdeystviye elektricheskogo polya raspredelitel’nykh ustroystv 500 i 750 kV na obsluzhivayushchiy personal i sredstva dlya ego zashchity [Impact of electric field of 500 and 750 kV switchgears on operating personnel and means for their protection] // Podstantsii peremennogo toka. Alternating Current Substations. Moscow, 1974. P. 33–43. (In Russ.).
4. Dez Zh., Pirrot P. Raschet i izmereniye napryazhennosti elektricheskogo polya vblizi ustroystv vysokogo napryazheniya [Calculation and measurement of electric field strength in the vicinity of high voltage devices] // Vliyaniye elektroustanovok vysokogo napryazheniya na okruzhayushchuyu sredu. Environmental Impact of High Voltage Electrical Installations / Ed. by. Yu. P. Shkarina. Moscow, 1979. P. 10–19. (In Russ.).
5. Lozhnikov V. Ya. Tsifrovoy izmeritel’ napryazhennosti elektricheskogo polya promyshlennoy chastity [Digital meter of electric field strength at industrial frequency] // Pribory i tekhnika eksperimenta. Instrumentation and Experimental Techniques. 1981. No. 1. P. 275. (In Russ.).
6. Gatman S. Dvoynoy izmeritel’ elektricheskogo polya s zashchitoy [Double electric field meter with protection] // Pribory dlya nauchnykh issledovaniy. Research Instruments. 1968. No. 1. P. 45–49. (In Russ.).
7. Berent G. N., Pleys I. R. Datchik elektricheskogo polya [Electric field sensor] // Pribory dlya nauchnykh issledovaniy. Research Instruments. 1971. No. 6. P. 141–142. (In Russ.).
8. Misakian M., Kotter F. R., Kahler R. L. Miniature ELF Electric Field Probe // Instruments for scientific research. 1978. Vol. 7. P. 933–935. DOI: 10.1063/1.1135497. (In Engl.).
9. Biryukov S. V., Kaidanov F. G., Kats R. A., Lozhnikov V. Ya. Calculation and measurement of fields on EHV and UHV substations and near transmission lines // CIGRE-86. International Conference on Large High Voltage Electric Systems. Report 36-06, Session 27th August –4th September. Paris, 1986. 5 p. (In Engl.).
10. Patent 2776097 S1 Russian Federation, IPC G 01 R 29/12. Sposob izmereniya napryazhennosti elektricheskogo polya s ispol’zovaniyem datchika sdvoyennogo tipa [Method for measuring electric field strength using a dual-type sensor] // Biryukov S. V., Tyukina L. V., Tyukin A. V. No. 2021120706. (In Russ.).
11. Tyukina L. V. Modernizirovannyy metod izmereniya napryazhennosti elektricheskogo polya po srednemu znacheniyu sdvoyennymi datchikami i ustroystva ego realizatsii [An upgraded method for measuring the electric field strength by the average value of dual sensors and devices for its implementation] // Dinamika sistem, mekhanizmov i mashin. Dynamics of Systems, Mechanisms and Machines. 2021. Vol. 9, no 3. P. 64–72. DOI: 10.25206/2310-9793-9-3-64-72. (In Russ.).
12. Chugunov S. A., Yurkevich V. M. Rasshireniye zony izmereniya parametrov elektricheskogo polya pri primenenii zondovogo metoda [Extension of the electric field measurement area using the probe method] // Izmeritelnaya tekhnika. Measuring Technology. 1981. No. 1. P. 33–35. (In Russ.).
13. Biryukov S. V. Izmereniye napryazhennosti elektricheskikh poley v dielektricheskikh sredakh elektroinduktsionnymi datchikami. Metody i sredstva izmereniy [Measurement of electric field strength in dielectric media by electroinduction sensors. Methods and means of measurement]. Omsk, 2011. 196 p. (In Russ.)
14. Patent 207465 U1 Russian Federation, IPC G 01 R 29/12. Ustroystvo dlya izmereniya napryazhennosti elektricheskogo polya so sdvoyennym datchikom [Device for measuring electric field strength with dual sensor] / Tyukina L. V., Dan’shina V. V. No. 202111599. (In Russ.).
15. Biryukov S. V., Glukhoverya E. G., Tyukin A. V. Sravnitel’nyy analiz ploskikh mnogoelementnykh datchikov napryazhennosti elektricheskogo polya s kruglym osnovaniyem i razlichnymi konstruktivnymi osobennostyami [Comparative analysis of flat multi-element electric field strength sensors with round base and various design features] // Omskiy nauchnyy vestnik. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. 2020. No. 3 (171). P. 57–64. DOI: 10.25206/1813-8225-2020-171-57-64. (In Russ.).
16. Xioa D., Ma Q., Xie Y. A Power-Frequency Electric Field Sensor for Portable Measurement // Sensor (Basel Switzerland). 2018. No. 18 (4). P. 1053. DOI: 10.3390/s18041053. (In Engl.).
Review
For citations:
Biryukov S.V. Comparative study of double and dual electroinduction spherical electric field strength sensors. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. 2024;(3):125-132. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25206/1813-8225-2024-191-125-132. EDN: IXQSUI
Views:
8
JATS XML
Email this article 