- » Aim and Scope
- » Section Policies
- » Peer Review Process
- » Publication Frequency
- » Open Access Policy
- » Archiving
- » Peer-Review
- » Publishing Ethics
- » Founder
- » Author fees
- » Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
- » Plagiarism detection
- » Preprint and postprint Policy
- » Revenue Sources
Aim and Scope
The main purpose of the journal is to inform the scientific and technical community about fundamental and applied research; to discuss issues in mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, power engineering, instrumentation and related spheres.
The journal objectives are:
- reflection of the results of scientific research, scientific-practical, experimental and innovative activities of domestic and foreign scientists, research workers;
- approbation of postgraduate students and applicants research;
- formation of open scientific polemics, contributing to the improvement of the quality of scientific research;
- ensuring effective research activities at the university, publicity and openness in the reflection of scientific problems of the university;
- carrying out effective expertise and publication of reviews of scientific ideas and works;
- publication of materials of scientific conferences and symposia.
Section Policies
Open SubmissionsPeer Review Process
Статьи, представляемые в редакцию, должны соответствовать профилю журнала.
Представленная автором рукопись направляется по профилю научного исследования или по тематике рассматриваемых в рукописи вопросов на рецензию членам редколлегии журнала или экспертам — ученым и специалистам в данной области (доктору, кандидату наук) с целью их экспертной оценки.
Все рецензенты являются признанными специалистамипо тематике рецензируемых материалов и имеют в течение последних трех лет публикации по тематике рецензируемой статьи.
Рецензенты уведомляются о том, что присланные им рукописи являются частной собственностью авторов и относятся к сведениям, не подлежащим разглашению.
Рецензирование — двойное «слепое» (Double-Blind Peer Review). Рецензия носит закрытый характер. Автору рукописи предоставляется копия рецензии или мотивированный отказ, без подписи и указания фамилии, должности, места работы рецензента. Копия рецензии может быть предоставлена по соответствующему запросу в Министерство образования и науки РФ.
Нарушение конфиденциальности возможно только в случае заявления рецензента о недостоверности или фальсификации материалов, изложенных в рукописи.
Если в рецензии на рукопись имеется указание на необходимость ее исправления, то она направляется автору на доработку. Автор (авторы) должны внести все необходимые исправления в окончательный вариант рукописи и вернуть в редакцию исправленный текст, а также его идентичный электронный вариант вместе с первоначальным вариантом и сопроводительным письмом-ответом рецензенту. После доработки статья повторно рецензируется, и редакция принимает решение о возможности публикации.
В случае несогласия с мнением рецензента автор рукописи имеет право предоставить аргументированный ответ в редакцию журнала. Рукопись может быть направлена на повторное рецензирование либо на согласование в редколлегию.
Решение о целесообразности публикации после рецензирования принимается главным редактором (заместителем главного редактора), а при необходимости — редколлегией в целом.
Редакция не сообщает информацию, касающуюся рукописи (включая сведения о ее получении, содержании, процессе рецензирования, критических замечаниях рецензентов и окончательном решении), никому, кроме самих авторов и рецензентов. Рецензентам не разрешается снимать копии с рукописей для своих нужд. Рецензенты, а также сотрудники редакции не имеют права использовать знание о содержании работы до ее опубликования в своих собственных интересах.
Рецензии на рукописи статей должны храниться в редакции журнала в течение пяти лет со дня публикации статей.
Рецензия может быть представлена в форме экспертной анкеты, утвержденной редакционным советом.
Требования к содержанию рецензии
Рецензия должна содержать квалифицированный анализ материала рукописи, объективную аргументированную его оценку и обоснованные рекомендации.
В рецензии особое внимание необходимо уделить освещению следующих вопросов:
— общий анализ научного уровня, терминологии, структуры рукописи, актуальности темы;
— оценка подготовленности рукописи к изданию в отношении языка и стиля, соответствия установленным требованиям по оформлению материалов рукописи;
— научность изложения, соответствие использованных автором методов, методик, рекомендаций и результатов исследований современным достижениям науки и практики;
— допустимость объема рукописи в целом и отдельных ее элементов (текста, таблиц, иллюстративного материала, библиографических ссылок); целесообразность помещения
в статье таблиц, иллюстративного материала и их соответствие излагаемой теме; рекомендации относительно рационального сокращения объема (указать, за счет какого элемента рукописи);
— место рецензируемой работы среди других, уже напечатанных на подобную тему: что нового в ней или чем она отличается от них, не дублирует ли работы других авторов
или ранее напечатанные работы данного автора (как в целом, так и частично);
— допущенные автором неточности и ошибки.
Рецензент должен дать рекомендации автору и редакции по улучшению рукописи. Замечания и пожелания рецензента должны быть объективными и принципиальными, направленными
на повышение научного и методического уровней рукописи.
В заключительной части рецензии должны содержаться обоснованные выводы о рукописи в целом и четкая рекомендация о целесообразности ее публикации в журнале.
В случае отрицательной оценки рукописи в целом рецензент должен обосновать свои выводы особенно убедительно.
Publication Frequency
4 times per year
Open Access Policy
This is an open access journal. All articles are made freely available to readers immediatly upon publication.
Our open access policy is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition - it means that articles have free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself.
For more information please read BOAI statement.
Archiving
- Russian State Library (RSL)
- National Electronic-Information Consortium (NEICON)
Peer-Review
Guideline for Submission and Publishing of Articles
About the content. The article should contain only original material reflecting the results of the author's research not previously published and not submitted to other publications.
On consideration of the submitted materials. At the first stage all scientific articles undergo mandatory testing for plagiarism. Articles containing less than 70 % of the unique text and violating publishing requirements are returned to the author (authors). Articles that have passed the verification of the uniqueness of the text and following the journal profile are sent for reviewing. The comments are transmitted to the author (authors). After the finalization, the reviewers analyze the materials again, after which the decision for publication is made.
Article format. The article should be typed in a text editor Word (with the extension *.doc or *.docx) (font — Times New Roman Cyr 14 pt, indentation — 0,5 cm, line spacing — one and a half without hyphenation in words). Print on paper in A4 format (210×297 mm). Pages should be numbered with a pencil on the back. The volume of the article is 16–18 pages, including figures and tables (excluding annotations, keywords, bibliographic list and information about authors); the text of the article should be at least 8–10 pages.
Margins: from above and from below — on 2,5 cm; left and right — 2 cm.
Header. In the upper left corner of the sheet the UDC is placed. Further, in the center, the title of the article is printed (the capital letter is only the first).
The title of the article can not be abbreviated. Below there are initials, the author's (authors') surname, the line below — the full name of the organization, through the comma — the city.
Below the line the text of the annotation and keywords in Russian are placed.
The abstract should reflect the main topic of the article, its relevance, purpose and objectives, as well as its results. In the annotation, the author (authors) indicates that the work is new in comparison with others related to the topic and purpose. The recommended average annotation volume is over 500 characters.
Keywords — 6–8 words/phrases, which should reflect the specifics of the topic, the subject and the results of the research. It is necessary to avoid common words and phrases. When selecting keywords, it is recommended to use terms and phrases used in the areas researched.
Next, the main text of the article is placed through the line.
The text of the article should be structured. Recommended sections: "Introduction", "Purpose of the research", "Highlights", "Conclusion".
If there are notes in the text, after the main text, before the bibliographic list, the title «Notes» is typed in the center and the text of the notes, numbered in the form of an upper index (for example, 1) in the order of the references in the text, is placed through the line. The reference to the note in the main text is bolded with a number in the form of an upper index (for example, ... models1). Automatic numbering of the notes is not allowed.
Formulas. Simple inline and single-line formulas that do not contain special characters (absent on the keyboard) must be typed with symbols from the keyboard without using special editors. Single special characters that are not present on the keyboard, formulas containing special characters that are not on the keyboard, and complex and multi-line formulas must be typed entirely in the Microsoft Equation 3.0 or MathType formula editor. It is not allowed to type part of the formula with symbols, and parts in the formula editor. If in the text of the article the formulas are numbered, then this numbering should be performed by a set of numbers. Automatic numbering is not allowed.
The text of the article should contain references to information sources (at least 10–15 sources).
— obligatory citation of modern works (the share of quoted publications published on the subject of the article is estimated over the past 5 years);
— the existence of a balance between references to domestic and foreign publications (shows how much the author (authors) of the manuscript know the current
state of the problem in Russia and abroad);
— the share of links to the articles of the author (authors) published earlier should not exceed 20 % of the total number of references.
References to information sources are numbered sequentially, as far as they are mentioned in the text, and are denoted by numbers enclosed in square brackets (for example, [1]). If the reference to the source of information in the article is mentioned repeatedly, then its number from the list is repeated in square brackets (without using the next sequence number and the link «Ibid» in the bibliographic list). In the case when they refer to different materials from the same source, the page number is also indicated in square brackets each time, for example, [1, p. 17] or [1, p. 28–29].
References. The text should contain links to information sources. Below the main text (or texts of notes), the title «References» is printed in the center and a numbered source list is placed through the line in the order of the text references in accordance with the current editorial requirements for the bibliographic description. In one point of the list, only one source of information should be indicated.
Tables are placed on a new page after the references list. The numbering of tables is made in the order of the references in the text. The table numbering is typed in bold with right alignment (for example, Table 1). The table heading (if available) is typed on the next line in bold type with center alignment. The reference to the table in the main text is made in bold in parentheses — for example, (Table 1). If the table has a large volume, it can be placed on a separate page, and in case it has a significant width, on a page with a landscape orientation.
Table names are given simultaneously in Russian and English:
Table 1. Name in Russian
Table 1. Title of the table in English
Figures are sequentially placed on a new page after the tables (or references). The numbering of figures is made in the order of the links in the text. The numbering header is typed in bold with a centered alignment (for example, Fig. 1). The thematic title (if any) is in the same line immediately after the numbering (for example, Fig. 1. Dependency ...). The link to the figure in the main text is bold in parentheses — for example, (Fig. 1). If the figure is large, it should be placed on a separate page, and in case it has a significant width, on a page with a landscape orientation. Figures can be scanned from the original (with a resolution of 150–300 dpi) or executed by means of computer graphics and saved in the formats JPEG, TIFF, BMP, PSD. The file size of the figure should not exceed 3 MB. The use of graphics in MS Visio format, various CAD and other programs is not allowed. Figures should be clear. All positions in the figure must be decoded and described. The legend of the figure should be easy to read, the font is not less than 8–9 pt. The name of the figure is placed directly under the figure and should not be included in the format of the figure.
The names of the figure are given simultaneously in Russian and English:
Fig. 1. Name in Russian
Fig. 1. Title of the figure in Russian
No more than eight figures and tables are allowed.
On the last page indicate the following information about the author (authors): surname, name, patronymic; academic degree, academic title, position, place of work, telephone number (not published); address for correspondence; for nonresident authors – the postal address to which the journal is sent in case of publication of their article; SPIN-code, AuthorID (RSCI), ORCID, AuthorID (SCOPUS), ResearcherID.
A separate page contains the English-language part of the article.
In the upper left corner of the sheet in English, the UDC is affixed. Further, in the center, the title of the article is printed (the capital letter is only the first) in English.
Below in English — initials, author (authors) surname, the line below — the full name of the organization, followed by a comma — country, city, street name, house number, postcode.
The line below is an Abstract and Keywords.
The Abstract should be informative, reflect the main content of the article and the results of the research. The volume is 150–250 words. It should not be a literal translation of the Russian version.
Keywords are placed under the annotation — 6–8 words/phrases, which should reflect the specifics of the topic, the subject and the results of the research. It is necessary to avoid common words and phrases. When selecting keywords, it is recommended to use terms and phrases used in the areas researched.
The line below is, if any, Acknowledgments.
The line below is the List of Sources in Latin, called References.
Description of References:
1. Authors (Surname, Name, Second Name) — transliteration.
2. The title of the article is transliteration.
3. The title of the article in English in square brackets.
4. The title of the publication is transliteration.
5. Name of the publication in English.
6. Imprint: place of publication, year, number, pages — in English.
7. At the end of the link in parentheses, indicate the source language in English, for example, (In Russ.).
After References the following information about the author (authors) in English is placed: surname, name, patronymic (transliteration); academic degree, academic title, position; address for correspondence.
For transliteration use the standard BGN (United States Board on Geographic Names).
It is necessary to submit a printed version of the article (with a personal signature of the author (authors)) and an electronic version of the article (send by e-mail: onv@omgtu.ru ), the original expert conclusion on the possibility of open publication and author agreement.
Address: 644050, Omsk, Mira Ave., 11, Building 6, Office 424, OmSTU, the Editorial Board of the journal Omsk Scientific Bulletin.
Tel.: +7(3812) 65-32-08, e-mail: onv@omgtu.ru
2. Guideline for Reviewing Manuscripts. The procedure of reviewing
Articles submitted to the editor should match the profile of the journal.
Submitted by the author manuscript according to scientific research topics is sent for reviewing to the members of the editorial board in charge of this topic, and experts which are scientists and specialists in this field of science (Dr., PhD). All reviewers are acknowledged experts on the subject of peer-reviewed material and have relative publications for the past three years.
Reviewers are notified that the manuscripts are the private property of the authors and are not subject to disclosure.
The journal uses double-blind peer review. The author of the manuscript provided a copy of the review, or a reasoned refusal, without a signature and the name, position, place of work the reviewer. A copy of the review can be provided upon request to the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation.
Confidentiality disclosure is only possible in the case of statements the reviewer of invalidation or falsification of material contained in the manuscript.
If the review indicates the need to fix the manuscript, the one is sent to the author for revision. The author should make all necessary changes in the final version of the manuscript and return the corrected text to the editor, as well as its revised electronic version and a cover letter — a response to the reviewer. The revised article is reviewed again, and the editors decide on the possibility of publication.
In case of disagreement with the opinion of the reviewer of the manuscript the author has the opportunity to give a reasonable response to the journal. The manuscript can be directed to additional review or to the editorial board for approval.
The decision on publishing the manuscript after review is made by chief editor (deputy of chief editor), and if necessary by the editorial board.
Journal does not give information concerning the manuscript (including information on its receiving, content, review process, reviewers' criticisms and the final decision) to anyone other than the authors and reviewers. Reviewers are not allowed to make copies of the manuscript for their needs. Reviewers and editorial staff have no right to use the information about the contents of the work before it will be published on their own interests.
Reviews of manuscripts are to be stored by the journal editorial for five years from the date of publication of the articles.
The review can be presented in the form of expert profiles approved by the editorial board.
3. Requirements for the review
The review should include a qualified analysis of the material of the manuscript, objective assessment and reasonable recommendations.
The review should give special attention to highlighting the following issues:
— A general analysis of scientific level, terminology, structure of manuscript, relevance to the topic;
— Assessment of readiness of the manuscript for publication in respect to the language and style, meeting the journal requirements;
— Scientific exposition used by the author matches methods, techniques, advice and research achievements of modern science and practice;
— The admissibility of the volume of the manuscript as a whole and its individual elements (text, tables, pictures, bibliographic references); the feasibility of space in the article tables,
illustrations and their compliance with the stated theme; recommendations for reasonable reductions in manuscript (indicate by which element);
— Place the manuscript under review among others published on this topic: what's new in it, or how it differs from others, whether manuscript duplicates the work of other authors
or previously published works of the author (in whole or in part);
— find incorrect statements and errors.
The reviewer should provide guidance to the author and editors to improve the manuscript. Comments and suggestions of the reviewer should be objective and global aimed at improving scientific and methodological levels of the manuscript.
The final part of the review assesses of the manuscript as a whole and a gives clear recommendation for reasonability of manuscript publication in the journal.
In case of negative review the reviewer should justify conclusions especially convincing.
Publishing Ethics
The Editorial Board of the journal «Omsk Scientific Bulletin» does everything possible to comply with the principles of publishing ethics in the preparation and publication of the journal. Compliance with the norms of publishing ethics concerns all parties creating this journal and participating in the editorial and publishing process: Authors, Editors, Reviewers and the Publisher.
The Editors seek to follow the ethical principles of the Declaration of the Association of Scientific Editors and Publishers «Ethical Principles of Scientific Publications» and the recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
The Ethics Principles for Authors of the Journal «Omsk Scientific Bulletin». Series «Aviation-Rocket and Power Engineering»
The Authors take the initial responsibility for the novelty and reliability of the results of scientific research, which entails compliance with the following principles:
1. The Authors of the article should provide only reliable results of the conducted studies. Providing errors or false statements and facts is unacceptable.
2. All Authors agree to submit an article to the journal and approve its final version.
3. The Authors of the article should ensure that the data obtained and the results of the research as described in the manuscript provided are completely original. Borrowed fragments or statements should be appropriately documented with the author and the source indicated (reference or indication in the text).
4. The Authors should not artificially increase the volume of their publications due to self-plagiarism.
5. The Authors should not submit to the journal a manuscript that has been sent to another journal and is under consideration.
6. The Authors should not submit to the journal an article already published in another journal.
7. Only persons who have made a significant contribution to the study or any significant part of it should be Co-authors of the article.
8. If there are significant errors or inaccuracies in the article at the stage of its consideration or after its publication, the Authors must notify the editorial office of this as soon as possible. If necessary, the Authors correct the data presented in the article or refute them.
The Ethics Principles for Editors of the Journal «Omsk Scientific Bulletin». Series «Aviation-Rocket and Power Engineering»
In their professional work, Editors are responsible for the content of published materials, which imposes on them the need to comply with the following principles:
1. When deciding on publication, Editors of a scientific journal are guided by the accuracy and accuracy of the data presentation and the scientific significance of the work in question. The decision to publish is taken regardless of commercial considerations.
2. Editors should evaluate the intellectual content of manuscripts regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, origin, citizenship, social status or political preferences of Authors.
3. Unpublished data obtained from submitted manuscripts should not be used for personal purposes or transferred to third parties. Information or ideas received during editing and related to possible benefits should be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.
4. Editors should not allow publication of information, if there is sufficient reason to believe that it is plagiarism.
5. Editors, together with the Publisher, must not leave unanswered claims concerning the manuscripts or published materials, as well as in the event of a conflict, and take all necessary measures to restore the violated rights.
The Ethics Principles for Reviewers of the Journal «Omsk Scientific Bulletin». Series «Aviation-Rocket and Power Engineering»
Reviewers carry out scientific examination of copyright materials. The actions of Reviewers should be unbiased, consisting in the following principles:
1. The manuscript received for review should be considered as a confidential document that can not be passed on for review or discussion to third parties without authorization from the editorial office.
2. Reviewers who do not have, in their opinion, sufficient qualifications for the evaluation of the manuscript, or do not have sufficient time for a qualitative review, or can not be objective, for example in the event of a conflict of interest, should notify the Editor of this request to exclude them from the process Reviewing this manuscript.
3. Reviewers are obliged to give an objective and reasoned assessment of the results of the research. Personal criticism of the Author on the basis of subjective data is unacceptable.
4. Unpublished data contained in the manuscripts submitted should remain confidential and should not be used by Reviewers for personal and commercial purposes. Reviewers do not transmit information about the manuscript and the data contained in the manuscript to third parties.
The Ethics Principles for the Publisher of the Journal «Omsk Scientific Bulletin». Series «Aviation-Rocket and Power Engineering»
The Publisher realizes that it is responsible for compliance with all current recommendations in the published work, which imposes on him the need to comply with the following principles:
1. The Publisher provides legal and financial support to the journal and ensures the timeliness of publication of the next issues of the journal.
2. The Publisher does not influence the editorial policy of the journal.
3. The Publisher edits, gives explanations and withdraws articles in which violations of scientific ethics or critical errors have been identified.
Codes
1. COPE
2. Elsevier for Reviewers
Founder
- Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education "Omsk State Technical University"
Author fees
Publication in “Omsk Scientific Bulletin" is free of charge for all the authors.
The journal doesn't have any Article processing charges.
The journal doesn't have any Article submission charges.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer’s own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Plagiarism detection
“Omsk Scientific Bulletin" use native russian-language plagiarism detection software Antiplagiat to screen the submissions. If plagiarism is identified, the COPE guidelines on plagiarism will be followed.
Preprint and postprint Policy
The editorial board of the “Omsk Scientific Bulletin" allows authors to post the manuscript as a preprint before submission for review and to archive independently their articles in disciplinary and institutional repositories.
Preprints
The editorial board of the “Omsk Scientific Bulletin" encourages uploading preprints on preprint servers. The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) defines a preprint as 'a scholarly manuscript posted by the author(s) in an openly accessible platform, usually before or in parallel with the peer review process.'
A preprint publication shall not be considered duplicate publication nor shall it influence the editor's decision to publish it in the “Omsk Scientific Bulletin".
The author must notify the editorial board of the “Omsk Scientific Bulletin" about the posted preprint at submission of the manuscript for review, furnishing a link to the preprint with its DOI identifier and the dissemination terms and conditions.
It is the author’s responsibility to add a link to the published manuscript in the preprint record. The link must contain the DOI and the URL of the article published on the journal's website. The original preprint should not be modified based on the reviewer’s and editor’s comments. The preprint should not be replaced with the text of the published article.
Do not delete the preprint text.
Manuscripts Accepted for Publication
The editorial board of the “Omsk Scientific Bulletin" allows manuscripts that have been reviewed and are accepted for publication to be archived independently.
This version of the manuscript may be disseminated through:
- personal website or blog;
- institutional repository;
- disciplinary repository;
- direct interactions with faculty or students by providing this version of the manuscript for personal use.
The text of the manuscript should contain the author’s clarifications about its status and information about the planned publication.
Example: The ARTICLE TITLE has been reviewed, accepted for publication, and will be published in 2021 (3) of the “Omsk Scientific Bulletin".
Once the final version of the manuscript is published, it is the author’s responsibility to add a link to the published article to the publication record. The posted text should not be modified based on the reviewer’s and editor’s comments. Do not replace the text of the posted manuscript. Do not delete the text of the posted manuscript.
Final Versions of Manuscripts
The editorial board of the “Omsk Scientific Bulletin" allows manuscripts that have been peer-reviewed, accepted for publication, edited and ready for publication (proofread and typeset) to be archived independently.
This version of the manuscript may be disseminated through:
- personal website or blog;
- institutional repository;
- disciplinary repository;
- direct interactions with faculty or students by providing this version of the manuscript for personal use.
Once the final version of the manuscript is published, it is the author’s responsibility to add a link to the published article to the publication record. The posted text should not be modified based on the reviewer’s and editor’s comments. Do not replace the text of the posted manuscript. Do not delete the text of the posted manuscript.
Revenue Sources
The publication of the journal is financed by the funds of the parent organization, at the expense of the publisher, publication of advertising materials, publication of reprints.
