Criteria for assessing the quality of additively manufactured counter-matrices for cold embossing
https://doi.org/10.25206/1813-8225-2026-199-46-55
EDN: RSOMYU
Abstract
The article examines general trends in production approaches within the framework of the Industry 4.0, focusing on the printing industry. The analysis highlights the opportunities and constraints of integrating digital technologies into existing manufacturing systems. Findings indicate that the sector contends with high raw material costs, reliance on imported machinery and intense market competition. To ensure competitiveness, enterprises should boost productivity, minimize waste and develop their own intellectual property portfolios. The author conducts the research on the feasibility of manufacturing counter-matrices for cold embossing using 3D prototyping. The capabilities of additive technologies in the production of die sets — specifically counter-dies — are analysed. Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), a layer-by-layer deposition technique, is selected for initial prototyping and printing of test objects to evaluate them with a set of quality criteria for counter-matrices. Moreover, the parameters for reproducing the linear dimensions of individual elements are verified using ABS and PLA materials compared with input geometric data. Therefore, the author confirms the compliance with acceptance criteria for industrial trials at an enterprise facility during the incoming inspection of the counter-matrices.
Keywords
About the Author
M. S. FedderRussian Federation
Mariya Sergeyevna Fedder, Associate Professor
Printing Technology Department
191186; Bolshaya Morskaya St., 18; Saint Petersburg
AuthorID (RSCI): 1355338
References
1. Kozlov D. R. Industry 4.0. Threats and challenges. Vestnik Nauki i Obrazovaniya. 2017;8(32):30–33. EDN: WQGUVV. (In Russ.).
2. Shvab K. Chetvertaya promyshlennaya revolyutsiya. Moscow, 2016. 138 p. (In Russ.).
3. Timokhin A. M., Tiunova E. S. Analysis of the printing market of the Russian Federation. MediaVector. 2022;4:111–115. EDN: JQCIGS. (In Russ.).
4. Mamedova L. E. G., Lesnik P. M. Methodological and practical aspects of ensuring competitiveness of industrial enterprises: goals, objectives and prospects for further development. Bulletin of the Academy of Knowledge. 2025;4(69):361–369. EDN: UYMRUJ. (In Russ.).
5. Horst D., Duvoisin Ch., Vieira R. Additive Manufacturing at Industry 4.0 : a Review. International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research. 2018;8(8):2454–4698.
6. Grekov G. I. Technological innovations and synchromarketing in print: New horizons. Practical Marketing. 2025;1(331):16–20. doi: 10.24412/2071-3762-2025-1331-16-20. EDN: YJYHQS. (In Russ.).
7. Gibson I., Rosen D. W., Stucker B. Additive Manufacturing Technologies: Rapid Prototyping to Direct Digital Manufacturing. Boston: Springer, 2010. 459 p. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1120-9. ISBN 978-1-4419-1119-3. EDN: YDZUZH.
8. Frolova A. B., Shigapov A. I. History, current status and development prospects of additive technologies. Scientific News. 2022;29:198–202. EDN: THYPWV. (In Russ.).
9. Tsvetkova T. M. Issledovaniye rynka additivnogo proizvodstva v Rossii. Nauchnye zapiski molodykh issledovatelei = Scientific Notes of Young Researchers. 2015;4:13–21. EDN: VPKFQH. (In Russ.).
10. Additivnyye tekhnologii — odin iz drayverov razvitiya promyshlennosti. Additive Technologies. 2024;2. URL: https://additiv-tech.ru/publications/additivnye-tehnologii-odin-iz-drayverov-razvitiya-promyshlennosti.html (accessed: 12. 01. 2026). (In Russ.).
11. Levina T. A., Kushnir I. S., Gluhikh Ya. M., Klochkov A. Ya. On the influence of process parameters on the mechanical properties of 3D printing FDM : a Comprehensive review. Herald of the Ryazan State Agrotechnological University named after P.A. Kostychev. 2023;15(3):123–131 doi: 10.36508/RSATU.2023.39.12.017. EDN: FKMRJX. (In Russ.).
12. Armashova-Telnik G. S., Sokolova P. N., Degterev D. V. Additive technologies: an Innovative effect digitalization in industry. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2020;82(4):347–353. doi: 10.20914/2310-1202-2020-4-347-353. EDN: OOJOVJ. (In Russ.).
13. Troshin A. A., Zakharov O. V. Review of technological capabilities of FDM-3D printers. Modern materials, equipment and technologies. 2020;1(28):61–65. EDN: SHUGOC. (In Russ.).
14. Khlynovskiy A. 3D pechat' osnastki pri prototipirovanii izdeliy iz metalla. Additive Technologies. 2024;2. URL: https://additiv-tech.ru/publications/3d-pechat-osnastki-pri-prototipirovanii-izdeliy-iz-metalla.html (accessed: 12. 01. 2026). (In Russ.).
15. Zhukov A. V., Nikiforov A. A., Yakovishin A. S. Plastic materials for additive technologies (review). Vestnik of Saratov State Technical University. 2021;4(91):57–70. EDN: OEGRFD. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Fedder MS. Criteria for assessing the quality of additively manufactured counter-matrices for cold embossing. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. 2026;(3):46-55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25206/1813-8225-2026-199-46-55. EDN: RSOMYU
JATS XML




















